Subash kumar vs state of bihar 1991
WebIn Subhash Kumar vs. State. of Bihar - (1991) 1 SCC 598, the Supreme Court held that right to life is a fundamental right under Art. 21 of the Constitution and it include the right to enjoyment of pollution free water and air for full enjoyment of life. Web16 Jun 2024 · Subhash Kumar v. state of Bihar & others: Citation: AI 1991 SC 420: Date of case: 09 January, 1991: Petitioner: Subhash Kumar: Respondent: State of Bihar & others: …
Subash kumar vs state of bihar 1991
Did you know?
Web1 Jul 2024 · JUDGEMENT The judgment was passed in the year 1991 by the two-judge bench of Justice K.N Singh and Justice N.D. Ojha. Both the judges agreed and ruled in favor of respondents. Judges opined that the petitioner had a self-interest in the case and the matter presented by the petitioner was not concerned with the general public. Web1 Jul 2024 · In Subhash Kumar v. the State of Bihar (1991 AIR 420), a PIL was filed for ensuring the enjoyment of pollution-free air as well as water. Public Interest Litigation (PIL): Initially, due to the narrow concept of locus standi, the courts were not accessible to the poor and ignorant sections of society. But, this concept was relaxed in the Judges ...
http://rsrr.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Nikita-Pattajoshi.pdf Web14 Jul 2024 · Report on “Our Common Future”, 1987 submitted by Brundtland Commission headed by the Norwegian P.M. Harlem Brundtland. [4] Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar,1991 AIR 420 [5] S. Joseph v. State of Kerala, AIR 2007 NOC 545. [6] M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath, AIR 2000 SC 1997. [7] Art. 21, Constitution of India, 1950. [8] Ratlam Municipality
Web20 May 2024 · (1991), the Supreme Court held that the Right to Life is Fundamental Right under Art 21 of the Constitution and it includes right to the enjoyment of water and air for full enjoyment of life. Answer. Answer: Subhash Kumar vs State of Bihar, Pollution free. Web16 Jun 2024 · Climate justice as defined by the Supreme Court in the case of Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar in 1991, right to life under Article 21 is a fundamental right and includes the right to pollution free air and water for full enjoyment of life. Environment rights that helped emerging the theory of climate justice are per se a controversial term.
WebSubhash Kumar v. State Of Bihar Case Information CITATION CODES citation codes CASE NO. Letters Patent Appeal No. 136 of 2015, Arising out of, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. …
WebSubhash Kumar v. State of Bihar (1991)[9]: This case dealt with the problem of unauthorized mining in the state of Bihar. The Supreme Court established strict regulations for the granting of mining leases and ordered the closure of all illegal mines in the state. The case established the sustainable development principle, which states that ... c# generic property nullableWeb20 Mar 2024 · [11] Subhash Kumar v. the State of Bihar, 1991 AIR 420, 1991 SCR (1) 5. Pinterest Snegapriya V S A third-year student of law at Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT School of Law), budding first-generation lawyer cum legal researcher with multiple publications in various web journals and portals on different subject matters of law in issue. hanna alkalinity checkerWeb28 Jan 2024 · About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features Press Copyright Contact us Creators ... c# generics base classWebSubhash Kumar v. State of Bihar and others, 1991 - International ... c generic printer custom paper not availableWeb1 Sep 1991 · India Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar Data source Judicial Portal Date of text 01 Sep 1991 Country India Seat of court New Delhi Original language English Type of text … c# generic reference typeLooking at the facts of the case and the arguments presented by both sides, it is evident that the petitioner did not have a good cause of action and no good reason to contend that the respondents’ washeries were polluting the Bokaro river. Instead, the Bench agreed with the claims made by the Respondents while … See more Subhash Kumar, the petitioner filed a writ petition by way of public interest litigation and alleged that the respondents, West Bokaro Collieries and Tata Iron and Steel Company (TISCO), … See more The Supreme Court ruled that Article 32 of the Indian Constitution is intended for the protection of a citizen’s fundamental rights; it is an exceptional process to protect a citizen’s … See more The issues dealt with in this case are twofold; 1. Whether the petitioner was empowered to file a plea via a Public Interest Litigation? … See more The Petitioner claims that excess waste released in the form of sludge/slurry as effluent from washeries in the river leaves the carboniferous product on the soil, affecting the fertility … See more c# generic return typeWeb17 Mar 2024 · Subhash Kumar v State of Bihar 1991 SCR (1) 5 Sunil Batra v Dehli Administration and Others 1979 (1) SCR 392 Vishaka and Others v State of Rajasthan and Others 1997 6 SCC 241 ----- Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Edwards v The Bahamas, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Report No 48/01 (4 April 2001) c# generic repository include